A practical repertoire for the positional player after 1.d4 Vol.3

Sidelines

 

776-s7-c2-en
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
live

 

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
1.e41,166,62354%2421---
1.d4947,29855%2434---
1.Nf3281,60256%2441---
1.c4182,10256%2442---
1.g319,70256%2427---
1.b314,26554%2427---
1.f45,89748%2377---
1.Nc33,80151%2384---
1.b41,75648%2380---
1.a31,20654%2404---
1.e31,06848%2408---
1.d395450%2378---
1.g466446%2360---
1.h444653%2374---
1.c343351%2426---
1.h328056%2418---
1.a411060%2466---
1.f39246%2436---
1.Nh38966%2508---
1.Na34262%2482---
1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 Let us see what happens if black attempts a Stonewall 2...e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 Black wants to fight for control over e4 with this move. This can work when white has developed a knight to f3 but now white can still develop the knight to e2 or h3 this doesn't make sense. 3...d5?! The stonewall sort of works out when white develops the bishop to g2, but in this position white can still develop it to d3 or e2 4.Bf4 Nf6 4...Bd6 can be answered with 5.e3 4...c6 5.e3 Nf6 transposes 5.e3 c6 transposes 5...Bd6 6.Nf3 Bxf4 7.exf4 0-0 8.Rc1± 5...Bb4 6.Bd3 0-0 7.Nf3± 6.Bd3 Be7 6...Bd6 7.Nf3 There is nothing wrong with 7.Bxd6 but I just like to keep the tension and allow black to double our pawns on the f-file 7...0-0 8.0-0 Ne4 9.Qc2 Bxf4 10.exf4 Nd7 10...Bd7 11.Ne5 Be8 12.f3 Nd6 13.c5 Nf7 14.b4± with a huge space advantage 11.Rac1± 7.h3!? 0-0 8.Nf3 Ne4 8...Bd7?! 9.Qb3 is annoying for black as ...b6 is a rather weakening move b6 10.0-0 Be8? 11.cxd5! cxd5 12.Nb5 when black is already close to lost 9.0-0 Nd7 9...b6 10.Rc1 Bb7 11.cxd5! exd5 11...cxd5? 12.Nb5+- 12.Ne5± white can even consider g4 next move. The point is black cannot finish development with Nd7 because of a nice tactical shot: 13.Nxd5 cxd5 14.Nxd7 Qxd7 15.Rc7+- 10.Rc1 Ndf6 11.Qc2 3...Nf6 transposes 4.Bd2 Nf6 5.e3 0-0 5...Bxc3 6.Bxc3 Ne4 7.Ne2 0-0 8.f3 Nxc3 9.Nxc3 6.Bd3 b6 7.Nh3!? Bb7 8.0-0 2...d6 2...c6 3.Nc3 d5?! 3...Nf6 tr. 3...e6?! 4.e4 fxe4 5.Nxe4± 4.Bg5± 2...b6 3.Nc3 Bb7 3...Nf6 tr. 4.Bg5!? g6 5.e3 Bg7 6.Nh3! it is perfectly fine to continue 6.f3 Nf6 7.Bd3 6...Nf6 7.Nf4 0-0 8.h4± 2...c5 3.d5± 2...g6 this move gives white an extra possibility with 3.h4!? 3.Nc3 Nf6 tr. 3...Bg7?! allows 4.e4!± 3...Nf6 4.h5! Nxh5 4...Bg7 5.h6 Bf8 6.Nc3± 5.Rxh5 gxh5 6.e4 and this looks incredibly dangerous for black, e.g. Bg7 7.Qxh5+ Kf8 8.Qxf5+ Kg8 9.Nc3± 3.Nc3 d6 3...g6 This is by far the most popular move I think if this works then this is the best move order. Black is waiting with the development of Nb8 as there are better squares than d7 for it as we will see in the mainline. White however does have some interesting alternatives here 4.Bg5 4.h4!? is a very interesting alternative which tries to punish black's move order. It was seen in some high level games as well. d6 4...Bg7 5.h5 Nxh5 5...d6 1-0 (69) Nakamura,H (2787)-Caruana,F (2795) Saint Louis 2016 6.h6 Bf8 7.Bg5 e6 8.Nh3± 5...gxh5? 6.Bg5 0-0 7.e3± 6.e4 fxe4 6...Nf6 7.exf5 gxf5 8.Bh6 Bxh6 9.Rxh6± 7.Rxh5 gxh5 8.Qxh5+ Kf8 9.Bh6 d6 10.Nxe4 Qd7 11.Bxg7+ Kxg7 12.Qg5+ 4...h6?! 5.Nh3! Nc6 5...d6 6.Nf4 Rg8 7.d5± 5...e6 6.e4! Nxe4 6...fxe4 7.Nf4 Rg8 8.g4+- 7.Nxe4 fxe4 8.Qg4 Rg8 9.Qxe4 d5 10.cxd5 Qxd5 11.Qxd5 exd5 12.Nf4± 6.Nf4 Rg8 6...Kf7? 7.h5 g5 8.Ng6 Rg8 9.d5?? 7.g3± 4...c6? 5.h5 gxh5 5...Nxh5 6.e4 Nf6 7.exf5 gxf5 8.Bg5+- 5...Rg8 6.hxg6 hxg6 7.Bg5 Bg7 8.Nf3 Ne4 9.e3± 6.e4+- 0-1 (73) Sargsyan,A (2402)-Van Foreest,J (2673) Chess.com INT 2020 5.h5 Nxh5 6.Rxh5 6.e4 Nf6 7.Bd3 Bg7 7...c6 8.exf5 Bxf5 9.Bxf5 gxf5 10.Bg5 Bg7 11.Bxf6 Bxf6 12.Qh5+ Kd7 13.Nge2 7...fxe4?! 8.Nxe4 Bg7 9.Nxf6+ exf6 10.Rxh7 f5! 11.Rxg7! Kf8 12.Rxg6 12.Rxc7 Qxc7 13.Bf4 12...Qe8+ 13.Be3 Qxg6 14.Kd2!? 8.exf5 8.Nf3 8...Bxf5 9.Bxf5 gxf5 10.Bg5 Nc6 11.Nf3 Qd7 12.d5 Nd8 13.Nd4 Ng4! 14.f3 h6 and with some precise play black has managed to keep the balance 6...gxh5 7.e4 fxe4 7...Be6? 8.Be2! Kd7 9.d5 Bf7 10.exf5± 7...Qd7? 8.Nh3 Kd8 9.e5! ∆dxe5? 10.Ng5+- 7...c6? 8.Qxh5+ Kd7 9.e5 dxe5 10.Qxf5+ e6 11.Qxe5 Bd6 12.Qe2+- 7...Bg7 8.Qxh5+ Kf8 8...Kd7? 9.Qxf5+ e6 10.Qb5+ c6 10...Ke7 11.Bg5+ Bf6 12.Nf3+- 11.Qh5 Bxd4 12.Nf3 Bg7 12...c5 13.e5+- 13.e5! d5 14.cxd5 cxd5 15.Nxd5+- 8.Qxh5+ Kd7 9.Qh3+ 9.Qg4+ Ke8 9...e6 10.d5 10.Nxe4 Be7 11.Nf3 Qg8! 10...Qe8 10...Qf6 11.Bg5 Qf5 12.Be2 Bg7 13.dxe6+ 13.Nxe4 h6 14.Bh4 Qxg4 15.Bxg4 Ke8 16.Nh3 h5 17.Bxe6 Bxe6 18.dxe6 Rh6 19.Nf4 13...Qxe6 13...Kxe6? 14.Nd5+- 14.Nd5 h6 15.Bh4 Qxg4 16.Bxg4+ Kc6 17.Ne7+ Kc5 18.Bxc8 Nc6 19.Bh3 Nxe7 20.Bxe7 Bxb2 21.Rb1 Be5 22.Ne2 Kxc4 23.Be6+ Kc5 24.Bh4 11.Bg5 Be7 12.c5 12.Nh3!? 12...Kd8 13.dxe6 Bxe6 14.Qxe6 Bxg5 15.Qd5 h6 15...Bf6 16.Qxb7 Qc6 17.Ba6 e3 18.fxe3 Qxa6 19.Qxa8 Kc8 20.Qe4 16.Qxb7 e3 16...Qc6 17.Ba6 17.Nd5 exf2+ 18.Kxf2 Qc6 19.Ba6 Qxb7 20.Bxb7 dxc5 21.Bxa8 c6 22.Nf3 cxd5 23.Bxd5= 10.Qh5+= 9...Kc6 9...e6 10.Nxe4 Be7 11.Nf3 Qf8 11...Qg8 12.Bg5+- 12.Nfg5 Qf5 13.g4 Qg6 14.Bd3+- 10.d5+ Kb6 11.Na4++- 4...Bg7 5.e3 d6 5...0-0 6.Bd3 d6 7.Nge2 e5 8.f3 tr. 6.Bd3 e5 7.f3 7.Nge2 Nbd7 tr. 7...h6 8.Bh4 Nbd7 8...g5 9.Bg3 f4? 10.dxe5 dxe5 11.exf4 exf4 12.Bg6+ Ke7 13.Qb3 fxg3 14.Nxg3+- 7...e4?! 8.Bc2 7...0-0 8.f3 7...0-0 7...Nbd7 8.Nge2 tr. 7...Be6!? Ernst-Beukema, Belgian league 2023 8.d5 Bf7 9.e4 f4 10.Nge2 Nbd7 11.Nc1 0-0 12.Be2 a5 13.Nd3 h6 14.Bh4 g5 15.Bf2 b6 16.Qc2 16.g4!? 7...Nc6 8.Nge2 0-0 9.0-0 Qe8 10.Qd2 8.Nge2 I think this position is a slightly better version compared to the mainline for black, as in the mainline black developed the Knight to d7 early, but this is not the best square. c6 8...Nbd7 transposes to the mainline 9.Qd2!? I like keeping it flexible. If the position gets closed with d4-d5 followed by e3-e4 at some point white might consider castling queenside 9.0-0 Be6 10.Kh1 Nbd7 10...Na6 11.e4 11.d5! Bf7 12.e4 f4 13.Nc1 c5 14.Be2 3...e6 transposes 4.Bg5 Bb4 The most logical follow-up to 3...e6 4...Be7 5.e3 0-0 5...b6 6.Nh3 6.Bd3 Bb7 7.f3 c5 6...Bb7 7.f3 c5 8.Qd2 0-0 9.0-0-0!? h6 9...cxd4 10.exd4 h6 11.Be3 10.Bxf6 Bxf6 11.d5 6.Bd3 b6 7.Nh3! Bb7 8.0-0 h6 9.Bf4 5.Rc1 0-0 5...b6 6.e3 Bb7 7.Nge2 0-0 8.a3 Be7 White is comfortably better with the pair of bishops after 8...Bxc3+?! 9.Nxc3 Qe8 10.Nb5! inserting Nb5 Na6 is very awkward for black Na6 11.f3 Qg6 12.Bh4 Rae8 13.b4± 9.h4! Ng4 10.Bxe7 Qxe7 11.Nf4 6.e3 d6 6...Bxc3+ 7.Rxc3 d6 7...Qe8 8.Bxf6 Rxf6 9.Nh3! 8.Bd3 Qe8 8...e5 9.Ne2 h6 10.Bxf6 Qxf6 11.c5 9.Bxf6 Rxf6 10.c5! 6...b6 7.Bd3 Bb7 8.f3 7.Nge2 h6 8.Bxf6 Qxf6 9.a3 Bxc3+ 10.Nxc3 f4 11.Qf3 3...b6 There are many games here and most of them continued Nf3 or Bg5, however white has much stronger 4.e4! fxe4 4...Nxe4 5.Nxe4 fxe4 6.Qh5+ g6 7.Qe5 Rg8 8.Qd5+- 4...e5 is best according to the engine, but also here white stays on top after 5.dxe5 Nxe4 6.Bd3 Bb4 7.Nge2± 5.g4! e6 5...h6 6.Bg2 and now Bb7 would quickly lead to disaster after 7.h4!+- 6.g5 Ng8 7.Bg2 d5 8.f3 e3 8...exf3 9.Qxf3+- 9.Bxe3 3...c6 4.Bg5 Ne4 5.Nxe4 fxe4 6.f3!? d5 6...exf3 7.exf3± 7.Qd2 4.Bg5 Nbd7 4...e6 5.e4 fxe4 6.Nxe4 Be7 7.Nc3 0-0 7...e5 8.Nf3 exd4 8...0-0 CTRL f7 9.Nxd4 8.Nf3 e5 CTRL f7 8...Nc6 9.Be2 e5 10.d5 Nb8 11.Be3!? 9.dxe5 dxe5 10.Qxd8 Rxd8 11.Nxe5 Bb4 12.f3 4...g6? 5.Bxf6 exf6 6.e3 The engines don't like this structure at all for black. The pawn would be so much better off on f7 instead of f6 Bh6 7.g3 c6 8.Bg2 Na6 9.Nge2 0-0 10.0-0 and white is ready to start queenside expension Nc7 11.b4± 4...Ne4!? 5.Nxe4 fxe4 6.Qc2 g6 7.Qxe4 4...e5?! 5.dxe5 dxe5 6.Qxd8+ Kxd8 7.0-0-0+ Ke8 8.Nf3 Bd6 9.g3 Be6 10.c5 Bxc5 11.Nxe5 Bxf2? 11...Nbd7 12.Nxd7 Nxd7 13.Bh3 Bxf2 14.e4 12.Bg2 c6 13.e4± 4...c6? 5.Bxf6 exf6 6.e3± 5.e3 g6 5...c6 6.Bd3 g6 5...e5 6.Qc2!? h6 6...g6 7.0-0-0 h6 7...c6 8.g4! fxg4 9.dxe5 dxe5 10.h3 8.Bh4 Bg7 9.f4!? exf4 9...e4 10.Nh3 0-0 11.g4!± 10.exf4 0-0 11.Nf3± 7.Bxf6 Nxf6 8.0-0-0 e4 8...exd4 9.exd4 Be7 9...g6 10.Nf3 Bg7 11.Re1+ Kf7 12.c5 10.Bd3 0-0 11.Nf3± 8...Qe7 9.c5! dxc5 10.dxe5 Qxe5 11.Bc4! Qe7 11...Bd6 12.Nf3 Qe7 13.Nh4+- 12.Nf3 Be6 13.e4! Bxc4 14.exf5+- 9.f3 Qe7 9...Be7 10.fxe4 fxe4 11.Nxe4 0-0 12.Bd3 Kh8 13.Nf3 10.Kb1 c6 10...g5 11.h4 Bg7 12.hxg5 hxg5 13.Rxh8+ Bxh8 14.fxe4 Nxe4 14...fxe4 15.Nd5! Nxd5 16.cxd5+- 15.Nxe4 fxe4 16.Be2 c6 17.Rf1 Bf6 18.Bh5+ Kd8 19.Bg6 Be6 20.Ne2 11.Nge2 g6 11...exf3 12.gxf3 Qxe3 12...g6 13.Nf4 Rg8 14.Bd3± 13.Rd3 Qe7 14.d5 12.fxe4 fxe4 13.Ng3 Bg7 13...d5? 14.cxd5 cxd5 15.Bb5+ Bd7 16.Rhf1+- 14.Ncxe4 Nxe4 15.Nxe4 Bf5 16.Bd3 0-0 17.Rhe1 5...h6 6.Bh4 e5 6...g5 7.Bg3 Bg7 8.h4 g4 9.Bd3 e6 10.h5± 6...g6 7.Bd3 7.f4!? is possibly even stronger 7...Bg7 7...e5 tr. 8.Nge2 8.f4 would now be too late: e5 and white can't play Nf3 anymore because of ...e4 8...e5 tr. 7.Bd3 g6 7...g5?! 8.Bg3 f4? 9.Bg6+ Ke7 10.exf4+- 7...e4 8.Bc2 Be7 8...c6 9.f3! g5 10.Bg3 d5 11.cxd5 cxd5 12.fxe4 fxe4 12...dxe4 13.Bb3 13.Bb3 Nb6 14.Nge2± 9.Nge2 c6 10.Nf4 Kf7 11.Bg3 g5 12.Nfe2!? 8.Nge2 6.Bd3 Bg7 6...c6 7.Nge2 e5 8.f3 Be7 9.Qd2 6...e5 7.Nge2 Be7 8.f3 0-0 9.Qd2 7.Nge2 e5 tr. 8.f3 tr. c6 8...0-0 9.Qd2!? 9.0-0 is fine, but let's keep it flexible c6 9...b6 10.Bc2 a6 11.a4 a5 12.Qd2 b6 13.d5 c5 14.Nb5 Nb8 15.f4 Na6 16.e4± 9...b6 10.e4 f4 11.Bc2 8...h6 this is possibly already inaccurate 9.Bh4 0-0 9...b6?! Pruijssers recommendation in his course on the Dutch on chess24 10.e4! g5 10...f4?! 11.Nxf4 exf4 12.e5 0-0 13.exf6 Bxf6 13...Qe8+ 14.Be4 Nxf6 15.Bxf6 Rxf6 16.0-0± 14.Bf2± 10...fxe4? 11.Bxe4+- 11.Bf2 f4 11...fxe4 12.Nxe4 0-0 13.0-0 Bb7 14.N4g3!± 12.Bc2 0-0 13.Qd2 Qe7 14.0-0-0± 10.0-0 In the game Dreev-Vachier Lagrave, Riga 2021 white continued with 10.Qc2 and this is probably also fine, although I prefer the queen on d2 c6 11.0-0 Qe8 12.Bf2 b6 13.b4 Bb7 14.Rad1 Qe7 15.Qb3 Kh7 and here white could have played 16.e4 when white is doing very well, as f4 can be met with 17.c5! 10...c6 11.Qd2 Rf7 12.Rad1 Nf8 13.Bc2± - (52) Mikhalevski,V (2517)-Gorshtein,I (2469) Arad 2022 9.Qd2 0-0 10.0-0 Qe8 10...Qc7 11.Rac1 Nb6 I don't see another logical way for black to finish development 12.Kh1 Be6 13.d5 Bf7 14.e4 f4 15.g3 11.Rad1 Nb6 11...e4? 12.fxe4 fxe4 13.Bc2 11...Kh8 12.Bc2 12.b3±
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
06 Dutch--